In today’s American political landscape, one of the most notable and controversial figures is Karoline Leavitt, the 27-year-old White House spokesperson. Recently, her statements regarding U.S.-France relations have sparked strong reactions from observers and international opinion.
Levit, recognized as the youngest female White House spokesperson in history, rapidly rose to prominence after taking on this significant responsibility. However, her youth and limited experience have become subjects of severe criticism from seasoned political commentators and analysts.
The most recent controversy started when an unnamed member of the European Parliament from France stated that the U.S. no longer represents the values symbolized by the Statue of Liberty. The politician jokingly suggested France wanted the Statue back. Karoline Leavitt responded bluntly and somewhat undiplomatically: “Absolutely not. My advice to that low-level French politician is to remind them that if it weren’t for the U.S., the French would be speaking German right now. They should be grateful to our great country.”
This response immediately triggered a wave of criticism. Many felt Levit’s reaction was childish, historically inaccurate, and detrimental to America’s international image. Historical experts and seasoned political observers pointed out that her comments were not only uninformed but also disrespectful to the longstanding relationship between the U.S. and France.
Steve Schmidt, an experienced political commentator, strongly criticized Karoline Leavitt. He emphasized that the position of White House spokesperson had historically been held by respected and experienced individuals like Dee Dee Myers, and the role requires seriousness and deep historical and international understanding.
Schmidt reiterated France’s significant contributions to American history, particularly during the Revolutionary War, when they supported the American colonial army militarily, financially, and through training. Figures like Marquis de Lafayette became symbolic of the deep friendship between the two nations. Lafayette not only fought alongside American troops but also named his son George Washington Lafayette in honor of this relationship.
The Statue of Liberty, according to Schmidt, isn’t just a gift from France but symbolizes America’s core values and ideals—freedom and human rights. Karoline Leavitt’s statement disregarded this rich history, damaging America’s image and diminishing the symbolic significance of the Statue of Liberty.
Schmidt highlighted that Karoline Leavitt overlooked the thousands of American soldiers who sacrificed their lives on French soil during World War II and still rest there as a testament to the close bond between the two peoples. American cemeteries in France, such as Normandy, are meticulously maintained daily by the French, demonstrating their profound gratitude for American sacrifices.
Furthermore, Schmidt harshly criticized Karoline Leavitt’s lack of historical knowledge. He argued that she not only misunderstood the U.S.-France historical relationship but also America’s role as a nation of immigrants and freedom. Schmidt emphasized that America became the greatest nation globally because of contributions from immigrants worldwide who brought dreams of freedom and opportunity to this land.
He added that Levit’s attitude does not represent the real America but rather a narrow, shallow, and immature worldview. Schmidt warned that placing someone inexperienced like Levit in such an influential position significantly damages America’s international reputation.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(489x189:491x191)/karoline-leavitt-husband-nicholas-riccio-son-nicholas-031925-d7babcb41f4248249d294b03e745fab2.jpg)
This incident has once again highlighted internal issues within the current U.S. administration, where critics argue that crucial personnel sometimes are selected based not on merit and experience but loyalty or outward appearances.
Across social media and international news outlets, Karoline Leavitt’s remarks received mixed reactions, predominantly critical. Many observers urged the White House to exercise greater caution in choosing spokespeople to prevent avoidable controversies.
This incident is not only a costly lesson for Karoline Leavitt personally but also a wake-up call for leaders responsible for selecting and training individuals representing the country internationally. Understanding history, core values, and complex international relations is crucial for anyone speaking officially for America.
